Image copyright
Washington State Dept of Agriculture/Reuters

Image caption

The unidentified seeds seem to have been posted from China to US addresses

Amazon says it has banned international gross sales of seeds within the US after 1000’s of Americans acquired unsolicited packets of seeds within the mail, most from China.

The on-line retail large advised the BBC that it’s going to now solely permit the sale of seeds by sellers primarily based within the US.

US officers mentioned gardeners mustn’t plant seeds of unknown origin.

The packages are believed to be a part of a worldwide “brushing” rip-off to achieve constructive opinions for on-line promoting websites.

Amazon’s new pointers, in impact since 3 September, additionally prohibit the sale of seeds inside America by non-US residents. It added that sellers could also be banned if they don’t comply with the brand new pointers.

But the retailer has not confirmed if its ban will prolong to different nations.

News of the policy change was first reported by the Wall Street Journal.

At least 14 plant species have been recognized among the many thriller packages, together with mint, lavender and roses.

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Amazon says it’s going to solely permit home gross sales of seeds within the US

Unsolicited seed packages are additionally being reported in different nations, together with the UK. Last month Scottish authorities advised people not to handle the seeds, for concern they might harm native ecosystems.

In an replace on 11 August, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) mentioned specialists analysing the seeds discovered few issues with them, and that China was helping with investigations.

But the USDA has warned folks in opposition to planting the seeds, saying they could possibly be non-native species or carry pests and ailments.

So-called “brushing” scams contain sellers sending out low worth gadgets similar to seeds or rings. Each pretend “sale” then generates a web-based evaluation that seems to spice up the vendor’s legitimacy.



Source link