The Gandhi household had to defend itself aggressively towards prices by members that it had been negligent or lax in offering management and but refused to cede management of the celebration.


will continue to be interim president for six months until an All India Committee (AICC) session might be held to “select or elect” a successor. However, Rahul Gandhi remained noncommittal as members spoke at a seven-hour assembly of the Working Committee (CWC). Several requested him to resume as president, however he urged as an alternative {that a} committee may very well be shaped to help and recommendation the interim president as a part of collective management.



The CWC assembly was known as amid a letter signed by 23 high leaders – former chief ministers and former union ministers amongst them– that requested the interim president to prepare for a “full time” and “active” chief to run the celebration. The letter didn’t identify an alternate and it didn’t problem the Gandhi household’s declare to stewardship of the celebration. It famous that the Congress tended to be in reactive relatively than energetic in preventing the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and urged a extra proactive management was in order.


Resolution seeks ‘self-discipline’


The Congress management hit again sharply. The CWC handed a decision saying the necessity of the hour was to strengthen the fingers of Sonia and Rahul Gandhi and “no one can be allowed to undermine the party and the leadership”. The voices of the 2 leaders had “inspired crores of Congress workers” who had heard goal the federal government on a spread of points. The decision warned that interior celebration selections can’t be aired publicly for this violates “propriety and discipline”: a touch that additional criticism won’t be tolerated.


Account of what occurred on the assembly fluctuate. Rahul Gandhi and each attacked the seen face of the “rebels”, Ghulam Nabi Azad, who was present at the CWC. Sonia Gandhi said she was “harm” however Rahul charged that those that had signed the letter have been traitors to the Congress trigger as they have been in collusion with the BJP. Stung at this Azad supplied to resign and Kapil Sibal, one other signatory, stated publicly in a tweet that he had by no means sided with the BJP in three a long time of his profession in public life, as an alternative providing proof of how he had fought the BJP.


Soon after, Rahul telephoned Sibal to make clear he had stated no such factor. Sibal withdrew the tweet and Azad additionally appeared to recalibrate his place. However, others stated Rahul Gandhi did, in truth hit out on the leaders. “There were 50 people at the meeting. They heard it,” stated a former chief minister.


Other faultlines have been seen on the assembly. Senior chief A Ok Antony, former Kerala chief minister and former defence minister, requested Rahul Gandhi to take over the celebration. Former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh requested Sonia Gandhi to continue on the helm of affairs.


The ‘insurgent’ leaders stated they have been compelled to write the letter to Sonia Gandhi after Azad’s requests for a gathering with ‘her have been by no means acknowledged. “Azad is leader of the opposition. If even he can’t get an appointment….what else are we supposed to do” stated a former chief minister.


Azad was the main focus of criticism on the CWC assembly as leaders like Ahmad Patel, Rajiv Satav and Ambika Soni accused him of “disloyalty”. A Ok Antony stated it was a “cruel letter”.


Mukul Wasnik, one of many signatories, stated: “I am what I am because of the Congress. I signed it because I thought it would improve the working of the party. If you feel you need to take action against me, I am ready to be punished.”



Some of those that signed the letter, which was delivered on 7 August, stated greater than 300 folks had been prepared to signal, however for tactical causes they took signatures solely from leaders of standing. “There is a groundswell of support for the idea that there is no leadership of the party. Rahul Gandhi has lost confidence completely. We never said we don’t want him, or anyone from the family: we just said: ‘if you don’t want to do it, let someone else do it,” stated a frontrunner.


These leaders acknowledged that the leak of the letter did them some harm. “We did not leak the letter. We drafted it (Kapil Sibal and Shashi Tharoor were the draftsmen) and sent it to 10 Jan Path on 7 August. After that, it is possible that the General Secretary (organization), KC Venugopal let it slip out. Then an expanded CWC was called and we were made to look as if we wanted the Gandhi family out. That was not our purpose” defined one of many signatories.


“Six months is a long time” stated a signatory when requested what was anticipated subsequent, referring to Sonia Gandhi’s interim tenure. “Right now, the family’s reaction is: ‘who are you? What right do you have to question us’. But are you seeing any reaction from the party’s front organizations? The NSUI? The Youth Congress? There is a coterie around Rahul Gandhi that benefits from this state of affairs. But this is our party as well.”