Donald Trump is going through renewed questions over his relationship with Vladimir Putin after reports that he was briefed in writing in February that Russia paid bounties for the deaths of US soldiers in Afghanistan.

After a gathering on the White House on Tuesday, Democratic members of Congress insisted the president should no less than have been conscious of the allegation in opposition to Moscow, but failed to act.

“Based on what we heard today, it was information that a) the president should have known about and b) based on what we were told today, he did,” Adam Smith, chairman of the House armed companies committee, told reporters.

Classified US reports advised a Russian navy intelligence unit supplied bounties to Taliban-linked militants to kill US and allied forces in Afghanistan, the New York Times reported last week.

The April 2019 killing of three US marines after a automobile rigged with explosives detonated close to their automobiles as they returned to Bagram airfield, Afghanistan is seen as one doable outcome of the programme, which the Kremlin has denied.

The damning allegations have revived acquainted questions from American political scandals: what did the president know and when did he realize it?

Trump has lengthy confronted scrutiny for his heat relationship with Putin, together with a refusal to settle for his personal intelligence businesses’ conclusion that Moscow intervened on his behalf in the 2016 presidential election; requires Russia to rejoin the Group of Seven (G7) main industrial nations; and the dispatch of ventilators to Russia to fight the coronavirus pandemic.

Trump and Putin spoke by telephone six times between 30 March and 1 June – an unusually excessive quantity – apparently with out the Afghanistan problem being talked about.

On Monday, the Times reported that info on the bounties was included in a each day written report delivered to the president in late February, with one unnamed official specifying 27 February – a date on which Trump hosted controversial superstar supporters Diamond and Silk at the White House.

Separately, the Associated Press mentioned senior officers in the White House have been conscious in early 2019 of the intelligence, and the evaluation was included in no less than one of Trump’s written each day briefings on the time. John Bolton, then national security adviser, informed colleagues on the time he briefed Trump on the intelligence evaluation in March 2019, the AP added.

Trump said on Sunday he was not informed of the allegations as a result of the data was not “credible”. The White House has claimed there was no consensus amongst intelligence businesses. The administration is but to deal with whether or not Trump obtained a written report or if he learn it.

At Monday’s White House briefing, the press secretary, Kayleigh McEnany, was asked if the data was contained in the president’s each day temporary, a abstract of high-level info and evaluation on nationwide safety points. She replied, fastidiously: “He was not personally briefed on the matter.”


White House: ‘Dissenting opinions’ from intelligence neighborhood on Russian bounty reports – video

White House officers briefed Democrats solely after sharing info with Republicans on Monday, prompting criticism that the Trump administration was enjoying politics over what ought to be a non-partisan problem.

After Tuesday’s assembly, Adam Schiff, chairman of the House intelligence committee, informed reporters: “As we look at these allegations, number one the president of the United States should not be inviting Russia into the G7 or G8. We should be considering what sanctions are appropriate to further deter Russia’s malign activities.”

Schiff, who prosecuted the impeachment case against Trump over a quid professional quo with Ukraine, added: “There may be a reluctance to brief the president on things he doesn’t want to hear and that may be more true with respect to Putin and Putin’s Russia than with respect to any other subject matter. Many of us do not understand his affinity for that autocratic ruler who means our nation ill.”

Ruben Gallego, a member of the armed companies committee, informed MSNBC: “It is clear that this president has warped the information stream. Because of his love of Putin and Russia, it has made it more difficult, in my opinion, for briefers and people that inform the president of what is happening to keep him up to date on Russian activity, and that has caused a lot of problems.”

Critics cost that although Trump is infamous for watching cable information as a substitute of studying his briefings, that’s no excuse. Tammy Duckworth, a Democratic senator from Illinois who misplaced her legs whereas flying a fight mission over Iraq, mentioned: “Ignorance isn’t exculpatory.”

Hillary Clinton, the previous secretary of state overwhelmed by Trump in 2016, tweeted on Tuesday: “Either he knew and chose to do nothing, or he didn’t know because he couldn’t be bothered to do his job.”

Trump’s dealing with of diplomatic relations took one other hit on Monday when Carl Bernstein, a veteran journalist who reported on the Watergate scandal that introduced down Richard Nixon, printed a devastating story on CNN’s web site.

“In hundreds of highly classified phone calls with foreign heads of state,” Bernstein wrote, citing as sources unnamed White House and intelligence officers, Trump “was so consistently unprepared for discussion of serious issues, so often outplayed in his conversations with powerful leaders like Russian president Vladimir Putin and Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and so abusive to leaders of America’s principal allies, that the calls helped convince some senior US officials … that the president himself posed a danger to the national security of the United States”.



Source link